Call Support +91-85588-96644
TCYonline

Login

Sign Up

Please enter a Username or Email ID
Please enter a password
Keep me logged in
Please enter your name
Please enter your mobile number
You can't leave Captcha Code empty
By submitting this form, you agree to the Terms & Privacy Policy.
OR

Sign Up via Facebook

Sign Up via Google

Sign Up via Twitter

Download Software
Tests given

Download TCY App

App Image
 
loading

LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS - June 2022

Jun 2022

Jun 20, 2023

Madras High Court Constitutes Special Bench for Implementation of POCSO Act, JJ Act

  • Taking in view the importance of implementation of the provisions under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, the High Court of Madras constituted a Special Bench for the purpose.
  • The Division Bench of Justice Sunder Mohan and Justice N. Anand Venkatesh directed the Registry to inform all the associations of lawyers and advocates in both Chennai (principal bench) and Madurai to assist the court in dealing with the subject matter, given the importance of the issue.
  • The High Court further instructed the Director General of Police (DGP), Pondicherry and the Tamil Nadu DGP to submit before it, all data related to the children in conflict with law and survivors below 18 years of age.
  • It also sought details of all cases pending before the police for investigation and before the court for adjudication under the JJ Act and the POCSO Act.
  • The Special Bench, comprising Justice Mohan and Justice Venkatesh, was constituted in line with an administrative order dated April 4, 2023, passed by the Acting Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, T. Raja.

Jun 18, 2023

Approver Need Not be Examined As Witness by Magistrate When Cognizance Is Taken By Special Court ...

  • The Supreme Court has held that when the Special Court chooses to take cognizance directly under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the question of Approver being examined as a witness in the Court of the Magistrate as required by Section 306 (4)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not arise.
  • A Bench comprising Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Pankaj Mithal passed the judgment in a case pertaining to allegations of criminal conspiracy to cheat BHEL. The Apex Court acquitted the accused persons who were convicted by the Special Court for CBI and whose appeals were dismissed by the Madras High Court.

Jun 15, 2023

Centre Notifies Appointment of 3 Advocates as Judges of Bombay High Court

  • The Centre cleared the appointments of three advocates, Shailesh Pramod Brahme, Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla, and Jitendra Shantilal Jain, as additional judges of the Bombay High Court for a period of two years. The Supreme Court had last month (May) recommended their names as judges of the Bombay HC.
  • The Bombay HC is functioning with 63 judges, 40 permanent judges, and 23 additional judges. However, the sanctioned strength of the Bombay HC, which is the second-largest in the country after the Allahabad High Court, is 94. With the elevation of three lawyers as additional judges of the HC, its strength will go up to 66.
  • The Bombay High Court was one of the three High Courts in India established at the Presidency Towns by Letters patent granted by Queen Victoria. It was inaugurated on August 14, 1862.

Jun 12, 2023

Panchayat Polls: West Bengal Government Disagrees to Calcutta High Court Suggesting Online Filing...

  • The government of West Bengal opposed the recent Calcutta High Court order, which suggested the state to permit online filing of nomination forms in the panchayat polls, slated to be held in the state on July 8.
  • Noting that no other state in the country had allowed online filing of nomination forms, the Counsel for the state government said that such a direction should be issued first to the Bharatiya Janata Party-led NDA government at the Centre.
  • The Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya had suggested the State Election Commission (SEC) of West Bengal to accept forms online.

Jun 10, 2023

Allahabad High Court: Ordering Recount of Votes without Concrete Evidence Not Correct

  • The Allahabad High Court said that it is not correct to order recount of votes on the basis of assumption without concrete evidence when the village head is declared victorious by one vote.
  • A Single Bench of Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery heard a petition filed by Khursheed Ahmad.
  • The case arose out of an election dispute with regard to an election for the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Jogiyabeer, Kshetra Panchayat Azmatgarh, Tehsil Sagri, District Azamgarh conducted on 19.04.2021.
Share on
Keep Yourself updated on Latest PTE Exam Pattern

Avail Free Topic-wise Tests and various other offers.