Call Support +91-85588-96644
TCYonline

Login

Sign Up

Please enter a Username or Email ID
Please enter a password
Keep me logged in
Please enter your name
Please enter your mobile number
You can't leave Captcha Code empty
By submitting this form, you agree to the Terms & Privacy Policy.
OR

Sign Up via Facebook

Sign Up via Google

Sign Up via Twitter

Download Software
Tests given

Download TCY App

App Image

GMAT AWA Forum

(44 Posts)

Post and discuss tips and tricks for building assertive and convincing arguments

Question should not exceed 100 characters.Use add options for multiple choice questions and "Uploadimage/Add related data" for passage text papers.
Question should be at least 10 characters long.
+
Add Options | Community Guidelines
Cancel
Palakprett Kaur walia
Posted on Mar 02, 2015 7:06 PM

Q.88
The memorandum is from a Vice president of Alta manufacturing company which states that sleep deprivation is the only cause of on the job accidents in a company .
The author is saying that there was thirty percent increase in the accidents than panoply industries which is having more working hours than ours. So to reduce
the number of accidents they suggested to shorten the working hours by one hour,only then there employees will get adequate sleep.

The argument suffers from many flaws.Firstly the analysis they talk about is only of the previous year ,what happen presently they haven't talk about that so there
might be less accidents.Moreover there is no base value for that as on what grounds they are talking about this value.

Secondly if the company will provide them with the lessen working hours,then how could employees will utilize that time in sleeping.Its not really that important that
this will provide employees adequate sleep . Employees could do anything in that time.

Also he is falsely assuming that fatigue is the only cause of increase in accidents ,there must be many other reasons of accidents ,like the employees of Alta manufacturing company might
not get proper training for the job they have been employed.Moreover there might be work load on employees ,which the employees may not handle properly.There might be
number of staffs employed on one particular machine ,so accidents may occur .In addition to that there could be the mismanagement of machines,not proper lightening and many
other reasons may arise .
In a nutshell,the reason recommended by the author that accidents occur only and only due to sleep deprivation of employees and what I feel is that it is wrong because there
could be many other reasons of accidents and what I suggested ,it could be one of them so to stop the number of accidents firstly they should find the proper cause for that and
only then there could be some solutions for that.

Please type your answer before submitting.
Aakash Singal
Posted on Oct 30, 2014 1:13 AM

This is the memorandum issued by the city council on the subject of arts they had stated that according to the survey they said about 15% more people started watching visual programs as compared to five years ago. During these years the number of people visiting has also increased. The corporate support to the public visual arts plan is facing shortage in the funds supported by these corporates which might led to decrease in the number of persons visiting the museum. Thus author concluded the city funding should direct towards the public television.

This memorandum is very well presented but still it has many flaws. The first flaw they are mentioning that according to poll 15% more residents watch T.V about visual arts. The point to be brought into consideration that the source which conducted the survey is reliable or not on which basis they are mentioning the percentage whether is it conducted by some reliable agency, website, newspaper and by the government it can be incorrect also. There is a time lag also in this argument, as the poll, which is organized five years ago for that no proper year is, mentioned neither the percentage so which makes difficult in comparison moreover the source which conducted poll is also not clear which should be mention clearly.

The other flaw, which we can see in this memorandum is that the people which are visiting the arts museum has increased by similar percentage again the percentage is not mentioned clearly that how many people has increased in visiting the museum. The poll which has conducted according to that we cannot say that more percentage of people has increased in watching T.V programs or in visiting the museum because the sample size is not clear as the 15% is what number of people. Let us assume there is 10% of 1500 people watching T.V Five years ago on other hand if its 15% of 500 people so the old percent is greater.

The Last flaw, which we can see that they are mentioning in memorandum that due to redundancy in funding public television sector there would be decrease in the number of people visiting the museum. How there is link in watching T.V programs and visiting museum. How can reducing the television sector funding reduce the number of people going museum. Then the author is concluding that the city council should allocate some funds towards the public television so that there would be no decrease in people visiting museum. If the point mentioned in memorandum would be clearer and it could be very helpful.

Please type your answer before submitting.
Amitoj Bedi
Posted on Sep 16, 2014 10:46 AM

Q24The education effectiveness of einstein high school has improved over the past two decades as the rate of students going for further education has increased considerably.This has been possible despite the fact that the school funding is the same as it was twenty years ago when adjusted for inflation.Thus according to the author there is no need to make any substantial increase in the school funding at this time. The conclusion above is questionable because of some of the assumptions made by the author.Firstly the rate of students going for further education has improved, so we cannot be sure that the actual number of students has increased or not.Thus is the improvement might not be certain.Secondly it is assumed that the lack of increase in funding has not affected the education effectiveness of the school.Also there can be many different reasons for the improvement in the education effectiveness over the time period. The first statement that the rate of students who went on to attend a college or university is questionable as the rate might have improved but the actual number of students going for further education might have declined.This may be possible as the total number of students studying in the school could have reduced and thus the actual number of students despite the rate being increased may have declined. Secondly the improvement is assumed to have occured despite the lack of any considerable increase in funding,whereas the improvement in education effectiveness is likely ton be caused by the increase in awareness about education as well as the increased value of education in the modern day society.Also the lack of funding may have restricted the improvements which otherwise would have been much more as better facilities can be provided to the students only with the increase in the schools funding. Morever the scenario today is a lot different from the scenario twenty years ago.There have been various changes which could have possibly caused the increase and it may not be certain that what caused an improvement earlier, may yeild the same results again. Therfore had the author been more clear about the asumptions ,it would have been much more clear.Also had the the author taken in acount the change in scenario from what it had been two decades ago,it would have been more conclusive. The without this information the argument remains unsustainable and open to debate.

Please type your answer before submitting.
Jimmy Malhan
Posted on Jun 09, 2014 8:58 PM

Q4

In an attempt to increase in the competing demand of newspaper, price needs to be cheap as The Bugle did. With a period of time, The Mercury can improve their circulation to capture the market relevantly by their strategy to attract business sector.

This argument is unconvincing because of two questionable assumption made by The Mercury as evidence to support its conclusion.

The first assumption as the author cites is “The Bugle” newspaper which was started five years ago and declined “Mercury” newspaper by 10,000 readers because of its lower-price strategy. I highly doubt this statement as within the period of 5 years, they might have experienced with lot of internal factors within an organization and external uncontrollable factors which could possibly remove their barriers.

For example: area coverage by the Mercury newspaper might not have targeted as business categorized people but service working populace. As a result, loyalty towards the newspaper is shifted.

The second assumption as the author cites is in order to survive in a market they needs to lower their price below that of The Bugle newspaper, at least until circulation increases at former levels. The increased circulation of The Mercury will attract more businesses to buy advertising space in the newspaper. Here, price as a cause is highly refutable to the effect of increase in circulation of their newspaper because price may not be the only reason of their failure to attract reader.

 For example: Content of the newspaper may not be up to the mark of the price paid by the customer .Also they can recheck the source of the news is reliable and most appropriate to public at large.

Moreover, Readers should find it attractive to read newspaper which will further increases the brand loyalty towards the brand. Circulation in demand is not only loaded on writings of newspaper. Nevertheless, Demographic factors like -age group of people, gender etc. also matters.

 

In inferences, if the author had mentioned all the relevant facts that are essential to objectively assess the situation under consideration, the argument would have been much stronger. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate

Please type your answer before submitting.