General Awareness

LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS - June 2022

Jun 2022

May 20, 2023

Adish Aggarwala is the New President of the Supreme Court Bar Association

Senior Advocate Adish Aggarwala was elected the new president of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA).
Adish Aggarwala defeated his rival Senior Counsel Dushyant Dave by securing 668 votes while the latter had 477 votes.
Senior Advocates Ajit Kumar Sinha, Dushyant Dave, Adish Aggarwala, and Rakesh Kumar Khanna, and advocates Neeraj Srivastava, Parvin Mutreja and Yagya Deo Sharma were contenders for the post of President SCBA.

May 19, 2023

Centre Notifies Appointment of Four Judicial Officers as Additional Judges of Madras High Court

The appointment of four judicial officers as the additional judges of the Madras High Court was notified by the Union Ministry of Law.
The four new judges are R. Sakthivel, P. Dhanabal, Chinnaswamy Kumarappan and K. Rajasekar.
The appointment of the four officers was recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium by a resolution dated March 21.

May 17, 2023

Collegium Recommends AP HC Chief Justice P. K. Mishra, Advocate K. V. Viswanathan to be SC Judges

The Supreme Court Collegium recommended the names of Andhra Pradesh High Court Chief Justice P. K. Mishra and senior advocate K. V. Viswanathan for appointment as judges of the top court.
Having a sanctioned strength of 34, including the CJI, the Supreme Court is presently functioning with 32 judges.
The decision was taken unanimously by a five-member Collegium headed by Chief Justice of India D. Y. Chandrachud in view of two clear vacancies that arose following the retirement of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice M. R. Shah.

Central Government Notifies Appointment of Dharmesh Sharma as Additional Judge of Delhi High Court

The appointment of judicial officer Dharmesh Sharma as an additional judge of the Delhi High Court was cleared by the Central government.
The Supreme Court collegium on April 13 had recommended the name of Sharma for the elevation.
Prior to his elevation Justice Sharma was serving as the principal districts and sessions judge of Patiala House Court.
As a judge he has given some very important verdicts in the past including the Unnao rape and murder case. Another important case, he was involved in was Uphaar fire tragedy evidence tampering case.
Justice Sharma was born in Delhi on June 9, 1963. After completing his BCom (Hons) degree from Delhi University Karori Mal in 1984, he did his LLB and LLM from the DU's Campus Law Centre in 1987 and 2001.

May 16, 2023

Justice M. R. Shah Demits Office

Chief Justice of India D. Y. Chandrachud hailed Justice M. R. Shah, who demitted office as a Supreme Court judge, as "Tiger Shah" and said that his practical wisdom and excellent advice helped the collegium greatly in making decisions.
With the retirement of Justice Shah, who was appointed to the top court on November 2, 2018, the number of judges in the top court has come down to 32, including the CJI. The apex court has the sanctioned strength of 34 judges.

May 15, 2023

Representation of People Act, Delimitation Act Not Applicable to Scheduled Area in Absence of Gov...

The Supreme Court ruled that the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 were not applicable to the Scheduled Area in absence of the notification issued by the Governor of the State under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
The Bench of Justice A.S. Oka and Justice Rajesh Bindal had rejected a writ petition filed by Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action, noting that there was absolutely 'no merit' in the appeal and that the High Court was right in rejecting the petition.
It said under sub clause (e) of Clause (1) of Article 19 of the Constitution, every citizen had a right to reside and settle in any part of India. However by making a law, reasonable restrictions can be put on the said Fundamental Right as provided in Clause (5) of Article 19.
The Apex Court further dismissed the argument that the fifth schedule of the Constitution took away the right of a non-tribal person to settle down and vote in a scheduled area.

Allahabad High Court States Notice cannot be Faulted in a Legal Term of Section 138 (b) in Negoti...

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court while setting aside the summoning order observed that in a demand notice if other amount is mentioned with the cheque amount in a separate portion in detail, the said notice cannot be faulted in a legal term of Section 138 (b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
A Single Bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta passed this order while hearing an application under Section 482 filed by Prashant Chandra.

Share on

TCY Analytics (View Subscription Plans)

Subscribe to GK Updates

I want to receive

GK Tags

July GK, June GK, May GK, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, ENVIRONMENT, BUSINESS AND ECONOMY, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, SPORTS, NATIONAL AFFAIRS, DEFENCE, PERSONS IN NEWS, DAYS AND EVENTS, AWARDS AND HONOURS, GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND SCHEMES, GENDER/ HEALTH/ EDUCATION, ART AND CULTURE, BOOKS AND AUTHORS, TOURISM AND HOTEL INDUSTRY AWARENESS, ART AND CULTURE, LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS

Start Discussion

On any topic

Take Tests

Compiled from GK updates

Login

Sign Up

Forgot Password

Download TCY App

Unlock All Services And Enjoy The Premium Benefits

US$ 10

US$ 13

US$ 15

US$ 17

US$ 19

US$ 20

US$ 21

US$ 22

US$ 23

US$ 24

US$ 25

US$ 26