General Awareness

LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS - June 2022

Jun 2022

Sep 07, 2022

Govt. Extends Tenure of the Company Law Committee by One Year

The government extended the tenure of the Company Law Committee, which was constituted in 2019, by one year.
The term of the panel which was set up by the corporate affairs ministry in September 2019, was extended last year also.
The committee has the mandate for examining and making recommendations to the government on various issues related to implementation of the Companies Act and Limited Liability Partnership Act.
Currently, the 11-member committee is chaired by Corporate Affairs Secretary Rajesh Verma.

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre on Scrapped Section 66A of IT Act Being Used in FIRs, Arrests

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Central Government on a petition alleging that the scrapped Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 was still being used in filing of FIRs and making arrests across the country.
A Bench of Chief Justice U.U. Lalit and Justice Ravindra Bhat directed the Union Government to get in touch with Chief Secretaries of states, where cases under Section 66A of IT Act were still being registered and impress upon them to take remedial measures.
The Apex Court granted the Centre three weeks time to complete the whole exercise.
The notice was issued on a petition seeking directions to implement the verdict in Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, which declared Section 66A of the IT Act as unconstitutional.
Section 66A granted wide powers of arrest to the government for 'grossly offensive' or 'menacing' information shared online. The same was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015 for violating the right to freedom of speech and expression.

Sep 06, 2022

Court Cannot Become a Tool for the Petitioner's Resume: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has come up very badly on a frivolous petition filed by a law student, seeking compensation for detrimental effects of air pollution on his health.
The petition was heard by a single-judge bench of Justice Yashwant Varma who not only rejected the plea but also said that court is a serious place which cannot become a tool for the petitioner's resume or CV.
The petitioner had moved to the Court for seeking compensation of Rs. 15 lakh and health insurance of Rs. 25 lakh.
In its findings, Court noted that no evidence or medical report was found, which could clarify the claims made.The Court noted that there was no medical proof to show any personal injury to the petitioner and the plea is misconceived.

Sep 05, 2022

President Nominates Justice DY Chandrachud as Next Chairperson of NALSA

Justice D. Y. Chandrachud, a second senior-most judge in the Supreme Court, was nominated as executive chairman of the National Legal Services Authority with immediate effect.
President Droupadi Murmu nominated Justice Chandrachud to head the NALSA as executive chairman under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Justice Chandrachud took up the position that became vacant after Justice U.U. Lalit was elevated as the 49th Chief Justice of India.
The NALSA was constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to provide free Legal Services to the weaker sections of the society.

Sep 04, 2022

UP Govt. Liable for Paying Compensation for Hooch Deaths, Says HC

The Allahabad High Court held the Uttar Pradesh government liable for paying compensation for deaths due to consumption of spurious liquor and directed it to file a reply within two weeks to a petition related to the death of 25 people after having hooch in Azamgarh in May 2021.
A division bench of justices SP Kesarwani and Saurabh Srivastava said prima facie the government has complete control and regulates the manufacturing and sale of liquor. "...[It] is also liable to pay a specified amount to the sufferer or successors of the deceased under the provisions of Mukhya Mantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna, which provides for compensation on account of death or permanent disability due to poison etc."

Sep 03, 2022

1992 Mumbai Riots Case: Supreme Court Reserves Judgement

The verdict was reserved by the Supreme Court in a petition that seeks implementation of the Justice Srikrishna Commission report filed which indicated that many police officers and certain leaders of the Shiv Sena were related to the 1992 Mumbai riots.
A Bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Vikram Nath asked the State of Maharashtra to file an affidavit for the detailed compensation provided to the victims of the riots within two weeks.

Share on

TCY Analytics (View Subscription Plans)

Subscribe to GK Updates

I want to receive

GK Tags

July GK, June GK, May GK, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, ENVIRONMENT, BUSINESS AND ECONOMY, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, SPORTS, NATIONAL AFFAIRS, DEFENCE, PERSONS IN NEWS, DAYS AND EVENTS, AWARDS AND HONOURS, GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND SCHEMES, GENDER/ HEALTH/ EDUCATION, ART AND CULTURE, BOOKS AND AUTHORS, TOURISM AND HOTEL INDUSTRY AWARENESS, ART AND CULTURE, LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS

Start Discussion

On any topic

Take Tests

Compiled from GK updates

Login

Sign Up

Forgot Password

Download TCY App

Unlock All Services And Enjoy The Premium Benefits

US$ 10

US$ 13

US$ 15

US$ 17

US$ 19

US$ 20

US$ 21

US$ 22

US$ 23

US$ 24

US$ 25

US$ 26