Madras High Court Designates 62 Lawyers as Senior Advocates
The High Court of Madras High notified the designation of 62 lawyers as Senior Advocates.
The notification was issued under Section 16 (2) of the Advocates Act, 1961.
About 175 applications were received after the notifications were issued in September 2020 and June 2022. The permanent committee had approved 149 eligible applicants. Interviews with these applicants took place between November 16 and 23, 2022.
Jan 12, 2023
National Heritage Status for Ram Setu: Supreme Court Directs Centre to File Affidavit
The Supreme Court directed the Union of India to file its affidavit on a petition seeking national heritage status for Ram Setu by the first week of February.
The matter was mentioned by petitioner-in-person and Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy before the Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice P.S. Narasimha.
Swamy told the Apex Court that the Central government had earlier committed to submit a counter by December 12, but it was yet to file the same.
The petitioner then requested the Court to summon the Union Cabinet Secretary as the matter was related to the Cabinet. Appearing for the Union government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta sought time till February first week, stating that the matter was under consideration.
Jan 11, 2023
Justice N. Kotiswar Singh Appointed Acting Chief Justice of Gauhati HC
Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh was appointed as the acting Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court.
Justice Singh would take over from January 12 after incumbent Chief Justice Rashmin Manharbhai Chhaya demitted office on January 11.
Jan 10, 2023
Authority Barred under Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be Appointed as Arbitrator: Allaha...
The Allahabad High Court, while disposing an application, observed that a person or authority barred under Seventh Schedule of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 2013, can neither be appointed as Arbitrator nor nominate a person as Arbitrator.
Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal passed this order while hearing an Arbitration & Conciliation Application U/s 11(4) filed by M.J.S Construction and others.
The prayer made in the application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Application Act, 1996 is for appointment of an Arbitrator for resolution of dispute between the parties.
Uniform Civil Code: Apex Court Dismisses PIL Challenging States Forming Committees for Implementa...
The Apex Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition which challenged the decision of the States of Uttarakhand and Gujarat for constituting committees for introducing and implementing the Uniform Civil Code (UCC).
A bench of Chief Justice D. Y. Chandrachud and Justice P. S. Narasimha termed a plea filed by one Anoop Baranwal devoid of any merit and said that constitution of such committees cannot be challenged as ultra vires before courts.
The Court talked about Article 162 and said that it indicates that executive power of states extends to what legislature permits it to. It further added that the Constitution of the committee cannot be challenged as ultra vires.
The bench stated that there was nothing wrong if states form committees as Article 162 of Constitution gives the power to executive to do so.
Jan 09, 2023
Petition Challenging Appointment of NUALS Registrar Withdrawn from Karnataka High Court
A petitioner withdrew his plea from Karnataka High Court, which challenged the appointment of Mahadev M.G. as Registrar of the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS).
The Division Bench of Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice C. Jayachandran, during the hearing, told the petitioner to file a representation before the UGC, considering the appointment was made in 2014.
After the Counsel for the petitioner asked for permission to withdraw the petition, the High Court granted the same.
Advocate Sanjai D. Rajan had argued in his petition that the appointment of the Registrar of NUALS was made in violation of the University Grants Commission Regulations and mandates.