General Awareness

LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS - June 2022

Jun 2022

Feb 07, 2023

CJI DY Chandrachud Inaugrates 10 Virtual High Courts in Orissa

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) D. Y. Chandrachud inaugurated ten new virtual High Courts in 10 different districts of Orissa.
CJI who addressed the event virtually said that very soon by March 2023, Orissa would be the very first State on India which would have virtual High Courts in all its districts.
Talking about the virtual courts, the CJI mentioned that most of the Odisha residents will not have to travel even hours away from their home to reach the High Courts. Lawyers from any part of the State would be benefitted.

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Appointment of Advocate Victoria Gowri as Additional Judge of ...

The Supreme Court rejected the two petitions that challenged the appointment of Advocate Victoria Gowri as Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, even as the latter was sworn-in to the post at the Madras High Court.
As the hearing was in progress, the swearing-in ceremony took place at the Madras High Court. Acting Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, Justice T. Raja, administered the oath of office and secrecy to Victoria Gowri and four other Advocates. These include Pillaipakkam Bahukutumbi Balaji, Kandhasami Kulandaivelu Ramakrishnan, Ramachandran Kalaimathi and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi.

Feb 06, 2023

Supreme Court Gets Five New Judges

Five new judges were appointed to the Supreme Court and Chief Justice of India D. Y. Chandrachud administered the oath to the five judges.
Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju had announced the appointment of Justice Pankaj Mithal, Chief Justice, Rajasthan High Court; Justice Sanjay Karol, Chief Justice, Patna High Court; Justice P. V. Sanjay Kumar, Chief Justice, Manipur High Court; Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah of Patna High Court; and Justice Manoj Misra of Allahabad High Court as apex court judges.
Their names were recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium on December 13 last year (2022).

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Petition in SC/ST Act Case

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court said that it is not mandatory to file a chargesheet after the FIR is lodged in every case under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The Division Bench of Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori heard the petition filed by Gyanendra Maurya.
The Petitioner has sought declaration that Section 4(2)(e) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and Rule 7(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Rules) 1995 be declared ultra vires Part III of the Constitution of India to the extent they said provisions necessarily direct for filing of chargesheet.

Feb 05, 2023

Five New Judges will be Appointed Soon, Centre Tells Supreme Court

The Union Government told the Supreme Court that five new judges, recommended by the collegium, would be appointed soon. Last month, the collegium recommended the names of three High Court Chief Justices and two judges for elevation to the apex court.
Attorney General R. Venkataramani told a bench of Justices S. K. Kaul and A.S. Oka that the warrant for appointment of these five names is expected to be issued soon.

Feb 04, 2023

Supreme Court to Celebrate Its Anniversary for First Time

For the first time ever, the Supreme Court of India celebrated the anniversary of its establishment on February 4. The 73rd anniversary was graced by Chief Justice of Singapore, Justice Sundaresh Menon, as chief guest and featured a lecture on the topic 'role of judiciary in a changing world'.
The Supreme Court came into existence on January 28, 1950, two days after India became a republic on January 26.
As per reports, it was CJI D. Y. Chandrachud's idea to start the tradition of celebrating the Supreme Court's anniversary.

Feb 02, 2023

Supreme Court Says Only Parliament Can Decide to Bar a Candidate from Contesting from 2 Constitue...

The Supreme Court refused to quash Section 33 (7) of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 that permitted a candidate to contest from two seats in elections, stating that no judicial interference was required in a matter that fell in the domain of legislative policy.
The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice J.B. Pardiwala dismissed the petition filed by Ashwini Upadhyay, observing that candidates may contest from different seats due to a variety of reasons. Whether this could lead to furthering of political democracy, was solely the Parliament's discretion.
The petition had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 33 (7) of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 on the grounds that it was unreasonable and arbitrary.

Share on

TCY Analytics (View Subscription Plans)

Subscribe to GK Updates

I want to receive

GK Tags

July GK, June GK, May GK, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, ENVIRONMENT, BUSINESS AND ECONOMY, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, SPORTS, NATIONAL AFFAIRS, DEFENCE, PERSONS IN NEWS, DAYS AND EVENTS, AWARDS AND HONOURS, GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND SCHEMES, GENDER/ HEALTH/ EDUCATION, ART AND CULTURE, BOOKS AND AUTHORS, TOURISM AND HOTEL INDUSTRY AWARENESS, ART AND CULTURE, LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS

Start Discussion

On any topic

Take Tests

Compiled from GK updates

Login

Sign Up

Forgot Password

Download TCY App

Unlock All Services And Enjoy The Premium Benefits

US$ 10

US$ 13

US$ 15

US$ 17

US$ 19

US$ 20

US$ 21

US$ 22

US$ 23

US$ 24

US$ 25

US$ 26