Call Support +91-85588-96644
TCYonline

Login

Sign Up

Please enter a Username or Email ID
Please enter a password
Keep me logged in
Please enter your name
Please enter your mobile number
You can't leave Captcha Code empty
By submitting this form, you agree to the Terms & Privacy Policy.
OR

Sign Up via Facebook

Sign Up via Google

Sign Up via Twitter

Download Software
Tests given

Download TCY App

App Image
Related Tests
CA Foundation (Business Correspondence and Reporting - 1)
Take Test
Mercantile Laws Test - 15
Take Test
CA - CPT Mock - 18
Take Test
CA - CPT Mock - 10
Take Test
CA - CPT Mock - 3
Take Test

Preparation for CA - CPT - Mercantile Laws

(48 Posts)

This thread is dedicated to preparation for CA - CPT. You may share questions related to topics like The Indian Contract Act, The Sale of Goods Act, The India Partnership Act etc.

Question should not exceed 100 characters.Use add options for multiple choice questions and "Uploadimage/Add related data" for passage text papers.
Question should be at least 10 characters long.
+
Add Options | Community Guidelines
Cancel
R I S H I
Shared from Indian Contract Act on Oct 30, 2021 8:52 AM

A's car was completely destroyed in an accident. The fact was known to him. Still, he made an agreement with B to sell him the car in good condition and received advance money from him. In this case

 
the contract is void
B has no legal remedy
B can sue A for the loss caused to him
B should request A to give back the advance money only
Please type your answer before submitting.

FROM THE VIEW OF BUYERS BEWARE ........... THE BUYER HAS TO BE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT HE SHOULD CHECK THE CONDITIONS OF THE CAR BEFORE GIVING ANY ADVANCE RIGHT?

Praveen Upadhayay
Posted on Nov 24, 2016 4:07 PM

Quasi contractual obligation arise by principal of

Please type your answer before submitting.

A equity justice and good conscience B Restitution C rescission d none of above

Atharva Sirdeshmukh
Posted on Jun 11, 2016 12:46 PM

In case of illegal agreements, the collateral agreements are

 
valid
Illegal
voidable
void
Please type your answer before submitting.

A

Sampath
Shared from Mercantile Laws Test - 15 on Jun 06, 2016 6:49 PM

Which of the following statements is true?

 
A contract with a minor is voidable at the option of the minor.
An agreement with a minor can be ratified after he attains majority.
A person of unsound mind cannot enter into a contract even when he is of sound mind.
A person of sound mind cannot enter into a contract when he is of unsound mind.
Please type your answer before submitting.

Contract with a minor is not voidable bcoz it is void AB initio so opt 4 is correct

Anil
Posted on Feb 02, 2016 10:34 PM

As per Section 11 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872, every person is competent to contract provided he

 
is of the majority age according to the law to which he is subject
is of sound mind
is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject
All of the above
Please type your answer before submitting.

Opt 4 is crt